Q1. Discuss what constitute lawful Consideration and lawful objects under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 along with the case law: Carlill vs. carbolic Smoke Ball Company.
- Lawful Consideration: Must not be forbidden by law, immoral, fraudulent, injurious, or against public policy (Section 23 ICA).
- Lawful Object: Purpose of agreement must not be forbidden by law, fraudulent, injurious, immoral, or opposed to public policy (Section 23 ICA).
- Section 23 ICA: Details conditions rendering both consideration and object unlawful, making the agreement void.
- Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.: Performance of a specified condition (using smoke ball) constitutes valid consideration in a unilateral contract.
Answer: Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a valid contract requires both lawful consideration and a lawful object. Consideration, defined in Section 2(d), is what one party gets in return for their promise, often described as a 'quid pro quo'. For it to be lawful, Section 23 dictates that it must not be forbidden by law, nor defeat the provisions of any law. Furthermore, lawful consideration must not be fraudulent, nor involve or imply injury to the person or property of another. It should also no...